
Toolbox was shocked recently, simply shocked, to see his 11-year-old
niece, to whom the family affectionately refers as "Little Hammer,"
writing an old-fashioned diary. And she wasn't posting her entries to
MySpace, Facebook, Blogger or any other publicly viewable forum.
Perhaps the rest of the World could learn a thing or two from Little
Hammer. In fact, when Toolbox got within three feet of Little Hammer as
she was writing, she scolded, "That's confidential," to which her Uncle
replies, "C'mon it's the Internet era; nothing is confidential. And if
you're so into confidentiality, you should consider law school." Then
Little Hammer gaveled the conversation to a close. (O.K., she got up
and left the room to go play Wii Fit, which Toolbox positively stinks
at—nothing worse than a computer telling you, "You're overweight.") The
point, anyway, and Toolbox does have one, is that in this crazy era of
24-hour on-ness, we forget that it's possible to have private thoughts,
opinions and realizations. We don't always have to share, and
especially for lawyers, the modern desire to do so should be weighed
against ethical proscriptions.
Continue reading " Back To School II — Dear Publicly Viewable Diary: The Ethics Of Blogging"

PLI: Given the ease and speed with which the transmission of
information and documents can occur in today's technological world,
isn't it fairly easy for lawyers to inadvertently disclose confidential
or sensitive information?
DAVID A. LEWIS: It can be. New and convenient technological methods
of communication absolutely bring with them the risk of professional
conduct problems if users are not extremely careful.
Today, all it takes to inadvertently disclose confidential or sensitive
information is a single click of a button. This type of mistake can
occur in a fraction of a second, but the potential consequences can
last a lifetime.

Does anyone (maybe there are etymologists out there) know why
spoliation isn't spoilation, or vice versa—why isn't spoil spoliate?
That's an English conundrum Toolbox has never been able to figure out.
There is a word "spoilation," which means "the act of stripping and taking by force."
And apparently, spoliation is a synonym of spoilation. (But Microsoft
Word auto-corrects "spoilation" to "spoliation," so Toolbox says,
"Uncle," and accepts this as something that will not be resolved in
this issue, especially when all that matters here is spoliation, which
is the "destruction or significant alteration of evidence, or the
failure to preserve property for another's use as evidence in pending
or reasonably foreseeable litigation." West v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.,
167 F.3d 776, 779 (2d Cir. 1999). The Model Rules of Professional
Conduct make spoliation a no-no (see Rule 3.4), so no matter how you
slice it, engaging in spoliation can spoil your practice. But in a
world where evidence is created by the minute (those darned computers),
how do you know if you're not engaging in spoliation. (Would that be
expoliating?)
Continue reading "Refrigerate After Opening? Avoiding Evidence Spoliation"
|