Thursday, May, 13, 2010
Kathy G. Gallo (Marshall Goldsmith Partners LLC) examines leadership succession planning in law firmsonstruction projects to end in dispute
PLI: What are the primary challenges of effective succession
planning, development, and execution for law firms?
KATHY G. GALLO: Our views on the challenges of effective succession planning,
development, and execution are informed by our work with many corporate
leadership transitions and by more limited experience with professional service
firms. Though unique in specific ways, most succession efforts share some
common challenges.
Rarely is adequate thought, time and effort put into succession planning ahead
of the need, for reasons including
- Unlike
more technical or hard skills (e.g. finance, operations, marketing, legal)
what effective leadership is — and in particular, how one develops
leadership skills — is not top of mind for many of those who make or
influence leadership succession decisions
- In
general, we are much more comfortable measuring what a leader has achieved
than how they have achieved it. This is especially true at the senior
levels of many organizations, where limited or no objective performance
evaluations are conducted beyond an assessment of quantifiable business
metrics (e.g. sales, market share, EPS, billable hours, etc.).
- This
reflects the lack of well defined and well accepted competency models
which include specific leadership skills and behaviors for senior roles.
Some exceptions include mature management consulting and accounting firms
with unambiguous up-or-out policies.
- Even in organizations where there are well established
competency models in place, other more emotional concerns prevent proper
planning for succession
- Assumed consequences for prematurely signaling to a
preferred successor(s) (e.g. inappropriate behavior of the successor,
loss of valued leaders who expected or hoped for the role, general
distraction created by campaigning, rumors, etc.);
- Fear that prematurely signaling externally creates an
expectation that if unmet or changed subsequently, will lead to concerns
that there is a "problem" (e.g. financial analysts, media,
customers, or clients expecting one outcome and then learning of another);
- The near impossibility of keeping confidential almost
any meaningful succession effort.
Even when succession planning
is conducted in a timely way, the challenge of properly assessing and
developing a preferred candidate(s) is often given inadequate attention.
- Although
a "readied" successor requires many different types of attention
and support, there is often no clear development plan, or if there is a
plan, there is insufficient accountability for executing it
- A robust development plan includes at least the
following elements
- An objective and holistic assessment of candidates’
readiness, with identified development needs communicated candidly to
candidates, including when feasible, an honest assessment of prospects
for succession. [Note — Where there is an intent to also consider
external candidates, internal candidates should be made aware. In almost
every case that we’ve seen where an attempt was made to keep awareness of
an external search from internal candidates, internal candidates have
become aware through their personal networks, breaches of confidentiality
internally, or through a search firm’s disclosure) leading internal
candidates to distrust of the process overall and in some cases to leave
prior to a decision.]
- Specific plans for providing support of
Incremental experience that would enhance a candidate’s readiness (e.g.
new role responsibilities, assignment to a project or committee, assuming
leadership for a key strategic decision)
Development of new or different skills/ behaviors (e.g. through media
training, leadership coaching)
Addressing the unmentionables (e.g. attire, grooming, etiquette)
Apprenticeship — what can be learned from the incumbent? (e.g. mistakes,
triumphs, relationship strategies, stories)
Exposure — who needs to meet or see more of the candidate? (e.g. firm
members at large, key customers/clients, investors, capital markets,
Board)
- Some sense of the decision making (e.g. process,
timing, influencers)
One additional element of
effective leadership succession that is often neglected is the need to provide
appropriate support for the outgoing leader, especially in cases where he/she
is leaving the organization
- Transitioning
out of a senior-most role is an emotional event which most transitioning
leaders have no prior experience with
- Some
are so ready to move on (or return to a "doing" role) that they
emotionally leave before the transition takes place
- In
other cases, senior-most leaders have very mixed emotions about leaving
and are prone to swoop in and out of involvement leading up to, or even
during the transition
- Increasingly,
when asked to provide succession readiness coaching, our coaching efforts
are spread between the successor and the incumbent
In law firms, the prevailing
practice of naming a new Firm Chairman seems to focus on appointing an
individual known to be an exceptionally good lawyer and/or client developer to
assume the role.
- This
practice may lead to appointment of unprepared leaders who have simply
been focused on other priorities
- With
such previous records of success, a leader will likely believe that he/she
can "figure it out"
- As
with any role at the top, there may be early blind spots or a reluctance
to ask for help
Best practice would include, at
a minimum, providing targeted leadership coaching to identified succession
candidates, using well developed techniques for behavioral change.
- Identify
a few, important development goals (e.g. develop a more inspiring presence
in front of large audiences; expand proficiency with delegation; develop
ability to coach and develop direct reports);
- Share
the goals with colleagues who have the appropriate line of site and a
willingness to help you develop — and ask them to help;
- Be
willing to take some risks in practicing new behaviors and to stay
disciplined to the point of sustained change;
- Assess
whether the desired changes are being noticed.
« Current Assets |
Main
|
William L. Deckelman, Jr. (CSC) explains why global compliance is getting more difficult by the day »
Back to top
Comments