Thursday, May, 13, 2010

Kathy G. Gallo (Marshall Goldsmith Partners LLC) examines leadership succession planning in law firmsonstruction projects to end in dispute

PLI: What are the primary challenges of effective succession planning, development, and execution for law firms?

KATHY G. GALLO: Our views on the challenges of effective succession planning, development, and execution are informed by our work with many corporate leadership transitions and by more limited experience with professional service firms. Though unique in specific ways, most succession efforts share some common challenges.


Rarely is adequate thought, time and effort put into succession planning ahead of the need, for reasons including

  • Unlike more technical or hard skills (e.g. finance, operations, marketing, legal) what effective leadership is — and in particular, how one develops leadership skills — is not top of mind for many of those who make or influence leadership succession decisions
  • In general, we are much more comfortable measuring what a leader has achieved than how they have achieved it. This is especially true at the senior levels of many organizations, where limited or no objective performance evaluations are conducted beyond an assessment of quantifiable business metrics (e.g. sales, market share, EPS, billable hours, etc.).
  • This reflects the lack of well defined and well accepted competency models which include specific leadership skills and behaviors for senior roles. Some exceptions include mature management consulting and accounting firms with unambiguous up-or-out policies.
  • Even in organizations where there are well established competency models in place, other more emotional concerns prevent proper planning for succession
    1. Assumed consequences for prematurely signaling to a preferred successor(s) (e.g. inappropriate behavior of the successor, loss of valued leaders who expected or hoped for the role, general distraction created by campaigning, rumors, etc.);
    2. Fear that prematurely signaling externally creates an expectation that if unmet or changed subsequently, will lead to concerns that there is a "problem" (e.g. financial analysts, media, customers, or clients expecting one outcome and then learning of another);
    3. The near impossibility of keeping confidential almost any meaningful succession effort.

Even when succession planning is conducted in a timely way, the challenge of properly assessing and developing a preferred candidate(s) is often given inadequate attention.

  • Although a "readied" successor requires many different types of attention and support, there is often no clear development plan, or if there is a plan, there is insufficient accountability for executing it
  • A robust development plan includes at least the following elements
    1. An objective and holistic assessment of candidates’ readiness, with identified development needs communicated candidly to candidates, including when feasible, an honest assessment of prospects for succession. [Note — Where there is an intent to also consider external candidates, internal candidates should be made aware. In almost every case that we’ve seen where an attempt was made to keep awareness of an external search from internal candidates, internal candidates have become aware through their personal networks, breaches of confidentiality internally, or through a search firm’s disclosure) leading internal candidates to distrust of the process overall and in some cases to leave prior to a decision.]
    2. Specific plans for providing support of

      Incremental experience that would enhance a candidate’s readiness (e.g. new role responsibilities, assignment to a project or committee, assuming leadership for a key strategic decision)

      Development of new or different skills/ behaviors (e.g. through media training, leadership coaching)

      Addressing the unmentionables (e.g. attire, grooming, etiquette)

      Apprenticeship — what can be learned from the incumbent? (e.g. mistakes, triumphs, relationship strategies, stories)

      Exposure — who needs to meet or see more of the candidate? (e.g. firm members at large, key customers/clients, investors, capital markets, Board)
    3. Some sense of the decision making (e.g. process, timing, influencers)

One additional element of effective leadership succession that is often neglected is the need to provide appropriate support for the outgoing leader, especially in cases where he/she is leaving the organization

  • Transitioning out of a senior-most role is an emotional event which most transitioning leaders have no prior experience with
  • Some are so ready to move on (or return to a "doing" role) that they emotionally leave before the transition takes place
  • In other cases, senior-most leaders have very mixed emotions about leaving and are prone to swoop in and out of involvement leading up to, or even during the transition
  • Increasingly, when asked to provide succession readiness coaching, our coaching efforts are spread between the successor and the incumbent

In law firms, the prevailing practice of naming a new Firm Chairman seems to focus on appointing an individual known to be an exceptionally good lawyer and/or client developer to assume the role.

  • This practice may lead to appointment of unprepared leaders who have simply been focused on other priorities
  • With such previous records of success, a leader will likely believe that he/she can "figure it out"
  • As with any role at the top, there may be early blind spots or a reluctance to ask for help

Best practice would include, at a minimum, providing targeted leadership coaching to identified succession candidates, using well developed techniques for behavioral change.

  • Identify a few, important development goals (e.g. develop a more inspiring presence in front of large audiences; expand proficiency with delegation; develop ability to coach and develop direct reports);
  • Share the goals with colleagues who have the appropriate line of site and a willingness to help you develop — and ask them to help;
  • Be willing to take some risks in practicing new behaviors and to stay disciplined to the point of sustained change;
  • Assess whether the desired changes are being noticed.

Bookmark and Share

Posted at 11:06AM | Permalink | Comments (0)

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.


« Current Assets | Main | William L. Deckelman, Jr. (CSC) explains why global compliance is getting more difficult by the day »


Back to top

About "In Brief"
PLI in Brief is the online home of Practising Law Institute's popular weekly eNewsletter series more...







Recent Archives
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
Complete Archive


Categories
All-Star Briefing
Compliance Counselor
The Lawyer's Toolbox
The Pocket MBA
Accounting
Antitrust
Bankruptcy
China
Class Actions
Communication & Media
Compliance
Consumer
Copyright
Corporate
Corporate Governance
Due Diligence
Employee Benefits
Employment Law
Environment
Estate Planning
Estates & Trusts
Ethics
Executive Compensation
Export Control
Financial Institutions
Financial Products
General Practice
Government Contracting
Green Tech
Hedge Funds
Immigration
Information Technology
Insurance
Intellectual Property
Internal Investigations
International
Law Practice Management
Licensing
Litigation
Mergers & Acquisitions
Patent
Privacy
Private Equity
Real Estate
Secured Transactions
Securities
Tax
Taxation
Trademark



20% off PLI Treatise!
Employment Law Yearbook 2008, by Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, the one volume source to help your clients lessen their legal exposure, no matter what front, including whistleblowing, workplace violence, downsizing, privacy, and trade secrets.
order...


20% off PLI Treatise!
Accountants' Liability, by Dan L. Goldwasser (Vedder Price Kaufman & Kammholz PC), M. Thomas Arnold (University Of Tulsa College Of Law), and John H. Eickemeyer (Vedder Price Kaufman & Kammholz PC). Use the link to order this uniquely comprehensive legal and tactical resource.
order...




sitesofinterest.jpg
PLI Patent Blog
Law Professor Blogs
WSJ Law Blog
DealLawyers.com Blog
CorporateCounsel.net Blog
US Supreme Court Blog




Archives


Bookmark and Share


Feeds

Add to your My Yahoo

Add to 

Google

Full-Content Feed

What are feeds?



Credits & Contacts
General Email Inquiry


Editor
Michael Singer



About PLI
PLI is a non-profit continuing legal education organization dedicated to providing the legal community with the most up-to-date information available. Founded in 1933, PLI's continuing mission is to enhance the professionalism of attorneys and other qualified persons by providing, in a cost effective manner, the highest quality and most innovative programs, online CLE, publications and other services to enable them to practice law competently and ethically, and to fulfill pro bono responsibilities.


All contents
Copyright © 2009
Practising Law Institute
810 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019-5818

For more information call (800) 260-4PLI
(212) 824-5710